[Papervision3D] Another blog post that completely misses the point

[Pete Hobson]

Well...  there is the point, that although we are going all crazy  
that this is 3d - on the web - and in flash... but

i don't think my mum cares too much...

She just cares that its 3d and on the web (ok, she doesn't really  
care at all)

The point is (i think) that these plugin people are the real  
competition out there, an the general public are not going to forgive  
a few display glitches here and there  just because its running on  
flash not some other plugin.

On 28 Feb 2007, at 17:24, tomsamson wrote:

> Yeah, this is even weirder than the Sandy comparison (which didn´t  
> make
> much sense in the way it was done either).
> Not just that those are two totally different engines and different
> models/demos were used for comparing the engines then, in this
> "comparison" case the guy is comparing a totally different
> technology/plugin with pv3d stuff, what sense is there in such
> comparison? hm.. :-)
> Slightly offtopic but any other pluin coming up would have to get  
> around
> flash´s limitations AND have at least most of flash´s strengths to  
> stand
> a propper chance to get similar widespread anytime soon, so yeah, bad
> luck for that other plugin ;-)
>
>
> Carlos Ulloa wrote:
>> http://oddhammer.com/index.php/site/ 
>> media_machines_giving_papervision3d_a_run_for_its_money_in_boots
>>
>> C4RL05
>> // noventaynueve.com <http://noventaynueve.com>
>> // papervision3d.org <http://papervision3d.org>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Papervision3D mailing list
>> Papervision3D at osflash.org
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/papervision3d_osflash.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Papervision3D mailing list
> Papervision3D at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/papervision3d_osflash.org